Originally Posted by bfourney
|
OK, so I've been trying this out and it seems to work pretty good. My question now is if there's a way to assign a default wire length and/or Headend to each interconnect SKU, or even if there's a way to do it in the phase settings. It would really make things go much faster if I didn't have to manually assign a wire length and HeadEnd every time I add an interconnect to a project, kind of like the way packages work. What would happen if I had no HeadEnd action assigned to that phase?
Also, is there any way to change the automatic settings for the wire ID that gets generated. Right now it looks as if it automatically gets assinged the 3 letter category ID and a unique number - not very descriptive. I know that you can manually change this ID, but is there some sort of setup for the automatic ID?
|
Agreed!
SI5 has eliminated the ability to HOLD the last selected Head End selected and the ability to use predefined Wire Lengths in Packages.
In SI4 if you put all your rough wire into projects via packages, the Head End and Wire length could be pre-defined and the prompts were bypassed.
The prompts are not so bad, actually good even with packages, but not holding the predefined head end or last head end selected is causing this aggrivation you are describing.
If this action was reactivated along with the wire prompts in packages, it would be a win-win.
Back in the day, you could set your default wire length to something short like 6, 8, or 10 feet that way when the custom interconnect prompted you to define a length, it was already reasonable, and when you select RACK or something in your head end list, it would stay when the next interconnect came up in the prompt.
Since it sounds like you are tying interconnects into packages, you could really benefit from haivng the behavior that SI4 has in it.
Right now, there is no point in defining a defaullt wire length and head end for wire in a packages in SI5 since the prompt does not even look at the information. HUH?!
I see this is posted in the SI4 section, so I am unsure what path you are on, what you are describing sounds like SI5.