Originally Posted by avzone
|
Adam, I may be wrong, but I think most of the NZ users (including myself) are interested in shapes that are more visually accurate than the D-Tools shapes. I'm visually oriented, so this just makes me "feel better" about the design from a visual perspective. I don't use NZ on all drawings though. It also helps detail oriented clients visualize how "things" are going to look. These may not be tremendously important in the grand scheme of things, rather more supplemental.
As far as integrating/linking NZ shapes to DT, I've been doing this for about 2 months now. I've started a document with the process and hope to finish it someday. Most may find it more labor intensive than they are willing to endure, but this is necessary to have EVERYTHING perform as it should. This includes scaling AND all of the current 'right click' features of the SI 5 shapes. I couldn't have done this without your help guiding me through a few tough spots, so thanks for that.
|
Please send me that doc when you are done. Maybe we can create some sort of utility that simplifies the process.